Score
Designs, implements, and operates end-to-end processes and tooling that ingest, convert, transform, and package digital assets for a target runtime or production pipeline, including format conversion, metadata handling, dependency resolution, and automation. Builds validation and benchmarking workflows to verify asset behavior and fidelity across scenes and targets and to monitor, test, and maintain pipeline performance and reproducibility.
This work addresses the growing complexity of CI/CD pipelines and the lack of structured analysis capabilities in existing tools for understanding their behavior, failures, and version evolution. The authors propose an innovative approach that uniquely integrates digital twin technology with BPMN-based modeling in DevOps contexts. By automatically parsing raw CI configurations and execution logs, the method constructs structured, high-level process models that enable pipeline visualization, failure traceability, and cross-version comparison. Evaluated across multiple open-source projects, the approach demonstrates effectiveness in monitoring, evolutionary analysis, and fault diagnosis, offering a modular and extensible foundational framework for the analysis and optimization of CI/CD pipelines.
This paper addresses the conceptual ambiguity, ill-defined boundaries, and lack of implementation standards between Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) and Pipeline-as-Code in DevOps practice. To resolve these issues, we systematically delineate their respective roles and synergistic mechanisms within the DevOps ecosystem and propose a reusable, standardized IaC-driven CI/CD implementation framework. Our approach integrates Terraform for infrastructure provisioning, Ansible for configuration management, GitLab CI for pipeline orchestration, and Docker/Kubernetes for containerized deployment—enabling an end-to-end automated delivery pipeline. Empirical evaluation demonstrates 99.8% configuration change accuracy, reduces environment provisioning time from hours to minutes, and significantly improves deployment consistency and delivery efficiency.
To address the insufficient security and scalability of engineering workflow automation and cross-organizational collaboration in Industry 4.0, this paper proposes an engineering workflow management approach integrating Asset Administration Shells (AAS) with BPMN. We innovatively design a distributed, write-on-copy AAS infrastructure to ensure data consistency and access security, and develop a lightweight workflow engine prototype supporting native AAS operations, enabling automatic mapping and execution of BPMN processes onto AAS interactions. This method unifies digital twin representation, asset modeling, and business process logic, thereby significantly enhancing standardization of engineering data exchange, end-to-end process traceability, and multi-stakeholder collaboration efficiency. Experimental evaluation demonstrates the system’s feasibility for secure inter-organizational coordination and its horizontal scalability across heterogeneous industrial environments.
This study addresses the challenge faced by production system engineers in automatically verifying production line layouts due to limited knowledge of PDDL and planning theory. To bridge this gap, the authors propose a novel approach based on an Asset Administration Shell (AAS) capability model that natively generates complete PDDL planning problems directly from domain-level descriptions, eliminating the need for PDDL-specific submodels. The method integrates four Industry 4.0 standards—VDI 3682, IEC 61360-1, IDTA 02011, and IDTA 02016—to construct the AAS and employs an extraction algorithm to automatically translate multi-AAS architectures into PDDL domains. In a laboratory case study, the approach enabled engineers to systematically compare four layout variants by modifying only the AAS model, significantly lowering the barrier to adopting automated planning in industrial settings.
Early-stage software development—spanning requirements elicitation, testing, and deployment—is hindered by ill-defined tasks and dense manual intervention points, impeding automation. Traditional CI/CD pipelines address only post-coding phases, leaving semantic gaps between underspecified stages unbridged. Method: We propose “workflow-as-software,” a novel paradigm that models end-to-end development as programmable workflows. Leveraging large language models (LLMs) as universal semantic adapters, our approach automatically reconciles heterogeneous task semantics. It integrates domain-specific workflow orchestration, a lightweight domain-specific language (DSL), and semantic translation interfaces. Contribution/Results: Evaluated in production at Volvo, the method reduced test automation effort by 2–3 full-time engineers and compressed the end-to-end development-to-deployment cycle to two months. It marks the first demonstration of LLM-driven, fully automated software delivery across the entire lifecycle—from requirements to deployment—thereby extending automation beyond conventional CI/CD boundaries.
Existing large language model (LLM)-driven data analysis tools are often confined to isolated subtasks and struggle to support end-to-end executable analytical workflows. This work proposes an autonomous, sandboxed, and auditable end-to-end system that leverages LLMs for action planning, iteratively generating structured operations, executing code in a secure environment, and integrating streaming traceability with intermediate result previews. By unifying a structured action backend, sandboxed execution, and an interactive visual interface—features integrated here for the first time—the system enables users to drive complete analytical workflows using only natural language. Users can inspect, modify, and export the entire process and its outputs directly within a web browser, ensuring full reproducibility, editability, and transparency throughout the analytical pipeline.
This work addresses the heavy reliance on expert knowledge in designing and debugging scientific workflows, a challenge exacerbated by existing large language model approaches that directly generate code without ensuring transparency, reproducibility, or seamless system integration. To overcome these limitations, we propose an AI-assisted scientific workflow management framework that decouples user intent from implementation through a structured specification phase, enabling specification-driven workflow generation and validation. We further introduce a multi-layer debugging agent powered by large language models to automate error diagnosis and correction. By deeply integrating with the Pegasus workflow system via the Model Context Protocol (MCP), our approach supports end-to-end workflow lifecycle management. Empirical evaluation demonstrates successful generation and execution of federated learning medical imaging workflows comprising thousands of tasks, substantially reducing debugging effort and empowering non-expert users to construct complex workflows adhering to expert-level design patterns.
This work addresses the challenge of integrating the industrial-scale B-Method tool Atelier B with the Lean proof assistant by introducing BARReL, a library implemented in Lean 4 that enables users to carry out the entire development process—from formal specification to machine refinement—using standard B syntax within Lean. The key innovation lies in leveraging Lean’s dependent type system to explicitly encode well-definedness conditions for partial B operators, thereby ensuring that all proof obligations are free from ill-formed instances. Furthermore, metaprogramming is employed to automatically generate well-definedness constraints and basic automation tactics. The approach has been validated on representative case studies, laying the foundation for a highly reliable and extensible, Lean-native toolchain for the B Method.