reliability and scaling

To address insufficient resilience of complex systems under heterogeneous hardware environments, this paper proposes a fault-adaptive software deployment and redundancy configuration optimization method. We construct a system-level resilience state-space model and introduce a novel equivalence relation to enable quotient-space-based state-space reduction, significantly compressing the state space. Subsequently, we integrate formal model checking with strategy synthesis to automatically derive both an initial deployment configuration and dynamic reconfiguration policies that satisfy multi-level resilience requirements. Our key contributions are: (i) a new equivalence relation enabling efficient, semantics-preserving state-space reduction; and (ii) end-to-end automated synthesis of fault-response and recovery strategies. Experimental evaluation on an autonomous driving system model demonstrates that our approach substantially improves fault recovery latency and system availability, while supporting real-time resilience assurance.

To address the challenges of standardizing Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) practices in heterogeneous environments and balancing system reliability with development agility, this paper proposes a customizable SRE process framework. The framework integrates automated operations, multidimensional observability (metrics, logs, traces), error-budget-driven governance, standardized incident response, and progressive delivery (canary and blue-green deployments). It is designed for cross-technology-stack adaptability, enabling contextual implementation of core SRE principles. Evaluated in production systems, the framework reduced mean time to recovery by 42%, decreased unplanned outages by 67%, lowered operational staffing requirements by 35%, and achieved 99.99% service availability. Its primary contribution is the first methodology for customizing SRE processes specifically for heterogeneous environments, empirically demonstrating synergistic improvements in both system reliability and operational efficiency.

本文介绍了Meta为解决大规模系统持续部署中速度与可靠性之间的矛盾，通过构建服务健康检查器进行自动回滚等方法保障部署安全。

本文提出了一种服务健康工程方法，通过结合遥测、工作流完成情况等手段来检测分布式系统中的静默故障和异步工作停滞问题。

This study addresses the lack of systematic guidance for enterprise software teams in choosing between monolithic and microservices architectures. The work proposes a decision-making framework that integrates technical and organizational factors, evaluating the trade-offs of each architecture across dimensions such as scalability, reliability, deployment efficiency, and organizational complexity. The assessment is grounded in system scale, business requirements, operational maturity, and long-term maintainability. Through architectural pattern analysis, a structured evaluation model, and multiple case studies, the authors develop a practical selection methodology tailored to real-world engineering contexts. This approach offers enterprises clear architectural evolution pathways and actionable guidelines aligned with their developmental stages, thereby significantly enhancing the rationality and sustainability of system design decisions.

This study addresses the challenge of effectively monitoring early-stage agent systems, where structural flaws often obscure task-level errors. The authors propose a three-dimensional (quality, suitability, efficiency) and three-granularity (intra-run, inter-run, structural) monitoring and triaging framework tailored for low-maturity agent systems. They introduce a novel system maturity staging model based on the coefficient of variation and monitoring granularity, integrated with a severity classification adapted from FMEA to guide human review. The resulting transferable monitoring architecture supports document-driven, multi-stage workflows, enhanced by a synthetic testbed with controlled error injection. Experimental results demonstrate that structural defects significantly mask task-level signals; 97% of issues can be automatically traced, with only 2% requiring human intervention, and each granularity level precisely identifies its corresponding defect type (coefficients of variation: 0.02, 1.25, and 0.00, respectively).

This study addresses the challenge faced by production system engineers in automatically verifying production line layouts due to limited knowledge of PDDL and planning theory. To bridge this gap, the authors propose a novel approach based on an Asset Administration Shell (AAS) capability model that natively generates complete PDDL planning problems directly from domain-level descriptions, eliminating the need for PDDL-specific submodels. The method integrates four Industry 4.0 standards—VDI 3682, IEC 61360-1, IDTA 02011, and IDTA 02016—to construct the AAS and employs an extraction algorithm to automatically translate multi-AAS architectures into PDDL domains. In a laboratory case study, the approach enabled engineers to systematically compare four layout variants by modifying only the AAS model, significantly lowering the barrier to adopting automated planning in industrial settings.

This work addresses the challenge of effectively evaluating the trade-offs between data consistency and coordination overhead among distributed transaction patterns—such as Saga and TCC—in business logic-intensive microservice systems prior to production deployment. The authors propose a lightweight microservice simulator grounded in Domain-Driven Design (DDD), which, for the first time, integrates DDD aggregate root modeling with multiple transaction models to decouple business logic from communication and transactional infrastructure. The framework supports configurable deployment topologies and network constraints, enabling seamless transitions from centralized to fully distributed architectures while providing a deterministic verification environment. Empirical evaluation on complex multi-aggregate systems quantifies the performance, coordination overhead, and resilience of different transaction models, substantially reducing development costs and facilitating left-shifted architectural validation.

This work addresses the unreliability of developer productivity dashboards, which often stems from ad hoc scripts that introduce undetected silent data gaps, eroding organizational trust. To resolve this, we propose a robust ELT pipeline grounded in DAG-based orchestration and the Medallion architecture, decoupling data extraction from transformation to preserve the immutability of raw data. Our approach introduces a state-driven dependency scheduling mechanism and, for the first time, treats metric pipelines as production-grade distributed systems. We emphasize the critical role of immutable raw history in enabling reliable metric redefinition. This methodology significantly enhances data reliability and freshness while effectively eliminating silent failures, thereby restoring organizational confidence in DevOps metrics.

This work addresses the lack of closed-loop control in traditional software development lifecycles, which often fails to simultaneously ensure security, auditability, and highly reliable automation. The authors propose a deterministic autonomous control framework that models the lifecycle as a seven-stage automated pipeline, integrating Jira-based task orchestration, structured context, resource constraints, and human-review gating mechanisms to establish a secure closed loop. Key innovations include a state-contract-based collision locking mechanism, a degradation protocol for fallback operation, and a traceable control architecture. Implemented with 12,661 lines of Python code and 6,907 lines of versioned prompt specifications—including 101 exception handlers and 12 centralized locks—the system achieved a 100% success rate (95% CI [97.6%, 100%]) across 152 initial runs, producing over 795 artifacts. All 51 issues identified through adversarial review were fully resolved, with 60% of security tickets autonomously completed.