π€ AI Summary
This study addresses the challenges of long-horizon sparse rewards, limited contact perception, and the simulation-to-reality gap encountered when single-arm robots manipulate oversized objects. To this end, we propose a current-aligned link manipulation framework. The method introduces a causal current mapper to eliminate discrepancies in actuator observations between simulation and hardware by leveraging motor currents as joint load feedback. Demonstration data are generated via privileged-information-based phased planning, and a unified student policy is trained through knowledge distillation combined with DAgger fine-tuning, establishing an end-to-end control architecture grounded in current perception. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves success rates of 76.2% in simulation and 73.3% on a physical robot, effectively validating the feasibility of whole-arm manipulation.
π Abstract
Most robots manipulate objects solely with their end effectors, whereas humans flexibly leverage different body parts, such as the forearm and elbow, especially when handling oversized objects. Learning such whole-arm manipulation is chal-lenging due to long-horizon sparse rewards, limited contact sens-ing, and the sim-to-real gap in contact and actuator dynamics. To address these challenges, we propose Current-Aligned Link Manipulation, a framework for learning long-horizon contact-rich manipulation using motor current as joint load related feedback. Three stage-specific policies first learn repositioning, grasping, and lifting using privileged simulation information, and a stage router sequences them to generate complete task demonstrations. For sim-to-real transfer, a causal current mapper predicts physical motor current from simulated joint histories, aligning the actuator current observation between simulation and hardware. A unified student policy then learns from these demonstrations using only deployable sensor observations and is further refined with DAgger. The task policies are trained entirely in simulation, and the final student is deployed on hardware. Experiments demonstrate 76.2% (762/1000 trials) complete-task success in simulation and 73.3% success (22/30 trials) on the physical robot for sequential oversized-object lifting.